Saturday, April 28, 2018

Government of Greed

Could it be that all the reality-show plot twists are simply a distraction from the real story? Joy Crane and Nick Tabor document a vast amount of corruption with an introduction by David Cay Johnston.
More than at any time in history, the president of the United States is actively using the power and prestige of his office to line his own pockets: landing loans for his businesses, steering wealthy buyers to his condos, securing cheap foreign labor for his resorts, preserving federal subsidies for his housing projects, easing regulations on his golf courses, licensing his name to overseas projects, even peddling coffee mugs and shot glasses bearing the presidential seal.
Conor Lynch points out how the philosophy of greed dominates American culture.
Throughout his life [von Clownstick] has been driven by greed and self-interest, and in the world of business this mentality has served him well. As the owner of his own company, [Fuckface] ran things with an iron fist, which partly explains his authoritarian style and why he has had such a difficult time adjusting to running a democratic government where his power is limited by checks and balances. [His] corrupt and self-serving administration should put to rest the notion that government ought be run like a private, for-profit company, or that managing a business (or, better yet, having a lot of money) qualifies one to run a country. Of course, it probably won't.
Update (April 29):  Michelle Wolf doesn't want us to forget the media of greed either.
I think what no one in this room wants to admit is that [Dear Leader] has helped all of you. He couldn’t sell steaks or vodka or water or college or ties or Eric. But he has helped you. He’s helped you sell your papers and your books and your TV. You helped create this monster and now you’re profiting off of him. And if you’re going to profit off of [Fuckface], you should at least give him some money because he doesn’t have any.

Sunday, April 22, 2018

Identity versus Issues

Amanda Marcotte explains the breakdown of political discourse.
[T]rolling liberals is no longer considered just a fun sport, but the ultimate purpose of conservative politics. The idea of making a positive argument in favor of conservative values has atrophied, leaving only the desire to troll in its place.
Some might talk about "making American great again", but it's not a positive vision.
[T]he American right has devolved into a nihilistic movement, prepared to tear down the country rather than share it fairly with women, LGBT people and people of color.
Even so, Uwe Bott finds signs of hope that the situation can be altered.
[M]aybe, just maybe, the ruthlessness and inconsiderateness of [Orangeman] has awakened the very forces that will possibly change the United States for the better.
Meanwhile, Sophia Tesfaye demonstrates how Republicans drag their feet on helping people if it means they might gain some advantage in the next election. And in an interview with Chauncey DeVega, Brian Schaffner finds a growing polarization among white people.
[Von Clownstick] seemed to benefit from receiving an unprecedented amount of support from whites without college degrees, a fact that was particularly important in states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. My research suggests that this support was strongly driven by racial resentment and sexism among that exact demographic.
And Conor Lynch notes that even within the Democratic Party, "tribalism has infected our political discourse [with] party loyalty [taking] precedence over political values". Conor refers to a study by Lilliana Mason.
While issue-based ideology is founded on a set of beliefs and a unique worldview, identity-based ideology, as the term implies, is mostly about group identity. Not surprisingly, the latter is much more likely to bring about the kind of political tribalism and personal resentment that we commonly see today. It is the "otherness" of ideological opponents, Mason writes, “more than issue-based disagreement, that drives liberal-versus-conservative rancor.”
Mason's research finds that "conservatives are even more likely to be driven by group identity than liberals, even though they might actually agree with liberal or progressive positions on many issues".  Lynch says that polarization will only get worse if politics remains a "team sport" where compromise does nothing to help you "win". And so he argues for more voices like Bernie Sanders
who talks about the issues and offers progressive solutions that are popular with the broader public, while avoiding overheated partisanship, [and who] appeal[s] not just to liberals and young people in blue states but to many voters in traditionally Red states. Though identity-based ideology has grown more pervasive over the past few decades, there is still a strong underlying desire for issue-based candidates.
Update (May 5):  David Mislin links conflict over support for the Viet Nam war with the rise of evangelical conservatives.
As it became apparent that many mainline church leaders had embraced the anti-war position, it became equally clear that not all U.S. Protestants agreed with them.
Mainline Protestant denominations ... went into decline, losing nearly one in six members between 1970 and 1985.
In the same years, Evangelical churches grew by double-digit percentages. They welcomed Americans who had abandoned mainline denominations to protest the liberal views of clergy on many social issues, including the Vietnam War. These churches supported the religious right and its brand of conservative politics.
Update (July 9):  Paul Rosenberg examines the history of evangelical and right-wing hypocrisy. And John Fea seeks to understand the appeal of von Clownstick to his (former) fellow believers.
The social and cultural changes of the Obama administration — particularly regarding human sexuality — sent conservative evangelicals into a state of panic. They saw [Orangeman] as the GOP candidate best suited to protect them from the forces working to undermine the values of the world they once knew.
Evangelical support for [Dear Leader] is also rooted in nostalgia for a bygone Christian golden age. Instead of doing the hard work necessary for engaging a more diverse society with the claims of Christian orthodoxy, evangelicals are intellectually lazy, preferring to respond to cultural change by trying to reclaim a world that is rapidly disappearing and has little chance of ever coming back.
Update (September 14):  Haydar Khan suggests that "intersectionality" logically leads to greater divisions among left constituencies.

Update (November 5):  Lynn Parramore interviews Adolph Reed and they agree:
If politicians continue to focus on issues like race, xenophobia, and homophobia without delivering practical solutions to the economic problems working people face, from health care costs to the retirement crisis to student debt, [we could] end up continuing to move in the direction of fascism.

Friday, April 13, 2018

Slowing Ocean Circulation

Studies published in Nature report evidence that the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation has weakened by about 15 percent since the 1950s. It's at the lowest point in the past 1600 years.
Climate scientists have been concerned since the 1980s that rising global temperatures could throw a wrench in the conveyor belt–like system, with possibly stark climatic consequences. Sea levels could ratchet upward along the U.S. east coast, key fisheries could be devastated by spiking water temperatures and weather patterns over Europe could be altered.
Such concerns had been quelled over the last decade as climate models suggested this branch of the ocean’s circulatory system was not likely to see a rapid slowdown, which would slow any consequences. But [the] new studies ... suggest the recent weakening spotted by ocean sensors is not just a short-term blip, as some had thought. Rather, it is part of a longer-term decline that has put the circulation at its weakest state in centuries. The results imply climate models are missing key pieces of the puzzle, and that ill effects could be on their way.
Update (April 28):  Thom Hartmann explains how the slowing AMOC could impact Europe.

Monday, April 9, 2018

Finding Our Way

Patrick Lawrence explains the need to understand the details for how modern global capitalism plays out in our lives.
A state of ignorance prevails, and I do not resist the thought that this is just as intended.
Lawrence presents Edoardo Nesi's personal experience with a shifting economy.
“At the heart of our civilization we find a huge problem,” Nesi reflected when I met him in New York a couple of weeks ago. “We have lost our way, haven’t we?”
The daily grind of the news seems to have the effect of protecting the system from any meaningful change simply due to the shear volume of preposterousness. A trade war looms in which Republican voters might get hit hard and yet they would likely hold their leader blameless. The GOP will take a hit in the next election and yet the political divide will remain largely unchanged. The administration seems intent on taking advantage of such an implausible amount of corruption that they can escape accountability and sow the seeds of doubt by hounding press reports as "fake news". Lost our way, indeed.

Lawrence says it's not a matter of going back to correct the mistakes.
Globalization and the post–Cold War “order” — here I insist on the quotation marks — were fated from the first to fail because they were fashioned fraudulently and in the interests of too few. There is no going back from where we find ourselves, in my view. The project is to begin again and anew. I have always detested nostalgia as a form of depression, I should add, and consider now the very worst time to indulge in any.
“I’m very afraid, I’m very pessimistic,” Nesi said as we finished conversing. “I don’t think there’s any way forward.” One understands this, too. But pessimism prevails only when looking back. Face forward, and there are no more grounds for pessimism than for optimism. The future, by definition, will take whatever shape we in the present choose to give it. This we call history. The making of history is up to us.

Sunday, April 8, 2018

Receding Grounding Lines

The stunning image is evidence of bad news in Antarctica.
Eight of the frozen continent's 65 major ice streams had retreated by more than 410 feet per year—five times the average rate of retreat since the end of the last ice age.
The grounding line retreat reinforces concerns about a worst-case Antarctic meltdown scenario, with global sea level rising 10 feet by 2100.

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

MLK

Sarah Ruiz-Grossman offers some ideas for remembering King's legacy.
1. Don’t whitewash King’s words
2. Fight poverty and economic injustice
3. Stand up against mass incarceration
4. Step off the sidelines and take action ― especially if you’re white
5. Support Black Lives Matter

Border Crisis?

Orangeman heard some story on FOX and is now ordering the deployment of the National Guard to help with border security. He's even blaming NAFTA for the current "crisis".

Ironically, Noam Chomsky wrote about this years ago.
Mexican economist Carlos Salas reviews data showing that after a steady rise until 1993, agricultural employment began to decline when NAFTA came into force, primarily among corn producers — a direct consequence of NAFTA, he and other economists conclude. One-sixth of the Mexican agricultural work force has been displaced in the NAFTA years, a process that is continuing, depressing wages in other sectors of the economy and impelling emigration to the United States.
It is, presumably, more than coincidental that President Clinton militarised the Mexican border, previously quite open, in 1994, along with implementation of NAFTA.
Chomsky notes that Mexico suffers more from the agreement than the U.S.
The “free trade” regime drives Mexico from self-sufficiency in food towards dependency on US exports.
Tamara Pearson reports on how the traditional Mexican diet is being replaced by American junk food.
This Coca-Cola and mass-junk food distribution was facilitated by NAFTA, an agreement that came into effect in 1994. It allows the U.S. to send its junk food here, while the U.S. imports tomatoes, chilies, cucumbers, limes, avocados, mangoes, and more from Mexico. In the 1990s, NAFTA meant that Mexican family farms couldn't compete with the U.S. agricultural giants, and five million Mexican farmers were displaced into the cities. It was a forced conversion of sorts, where U.S. fast food restaurants and corporations that specialize in selling cheap poison in pretty packets were given even more room to take Mexican resources and run the show.
If this is a crisis, could it be we brought it on ourselves?

Update (May 13):  Sophia Tesfaye writes that with 24/7 attention on Dear Leader's criminal activities, Jeff Sessions has cover to work his evil.
Out of the spotlight, obscured by [Fuckface's] other sidekicks and their latest scandals, Sessions has succeeded in centering immigration as the nation’s top law enforcement priority and at prioritizing criminal proceedings over their impact on crime. He’s quietly instructed prosecutors to go after low-level offenders and removed Department of Justice grants to study criminal justice reform. If his increasingly aggressive rhetoric is any indication, however, Sessions is eager to get credit for this crackdown on the most vulnerable people in our society.
Update (June 8):  Heather Digby Parton explains how cruel U.S. immigration policy has become.
The whole point of this is to make examples of these mothers and children and to deter asylum-seekers from even attempting to come here. And this is in spite of both domestic and international laws governing the rights of refugees. Apparently, those laws are no longer operative in the United States.
Update (June 15):  Over six weeks this spring, nearly 50 children per day were separated from their families at the U.S. border. Alicia Menendez forcefully criticizes this disgraceful policy.
I think it's just so important that we remember that this does not require legislation to be fixed. This could be handled by DHS by reversing this policy. And it is a crisis of America's own invention. It is taxing a system that was never meant to handle this type of overflow of children.
Update (June 18):  The DHS Secretary says "We do not have a policy of separating families at the border. Period." Roque Planas explains that
DHS policy ... is to refer 100 percent of illegal border crossings for criminal prosecution ― a step that previous administrations had refused to take. The logic undergirding Nielsen’s contention is that family separation is not the goal; attaining a 100 percent rate of prosecution for immigration violations is.
But von Clownstick continues to blame Democrats who have no power in Congress. Senator Lindsay Graham says Fuckface could stop it with a phone call. Even Laura Bush (not to mention Amnesty International) is critical of the administration's tactics.
I appreciate the need to enforce and protect our international boundaries, but this zero-tolerance policy is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart.
Planas refutes all the excuses made for why this is happening.
The only charitable explanation for systematically peddling these falsehoods is that the officials charged with carrying out this policy, along with prominent Republicans who don’t want to share the blame for it, simply have no idea what they’ve done.
But the simplest answer is the most plausible: ... Republicans seeking to deflect the blame over family separations at the border know exactly what they’re doing, and they know it’s unpopular. And to shield themselves, they’ve resorted to flagrant dishonesty and cast themselves as victims of the press.
Update (June 19):  Amanda Marcotte points out that most Republicans support the separation policy even while moral human beings do not. So, there's a lot of field-testing with various lies.
What [Fuckface] needs, in order to get even stronger Republican support behind him, is a story -- a narrative that allows voters to support this inhumane policy while maintaining the claim that they aren't bad people for doing so. The story doesn't have to make much sense or have any basis in truth. It just needs to be something supporters can roll out to sound halfway rational if challenged by friends or relatives about their support for this policy.
Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers recall the issues that drive migration in the first place.
Immigration ... is tied into issues of corporate trade agreements, regime change, US Empire, the drug war and capitalism. These issues are forcing a race to the bottom for worker rights and wages and destruction of the environment. They are driving a growing security state, militarization of law enforcement and mass incarceration. Border patrols lock people into countries where they face poverty, pollution and violence with little chance of escape.
Immigrants are the scapegoats, but it is the systems that are driving migration. Most people would prefer to remain in their home countries where they have roots, family and communities. Extreme conditions drive people to abandon everything and endure harsh and dangerous travel in hope of finding safety and the means of survival.
And Heather Digby Parton notes Laura Ingraham's fear that immigration will change "the electoral and cultural landscape of the United States forever". Conservatives feel threatened.
The nativism we are seeing play out right now is cruel and inhumane. It's born of an ugly strain of white nationalism that forms the core of the Republican Party under [von Clownstick]. But the conservative movement is still working feverishly on their own projects, using [Fuckface] and his demagoguery to serve their long-term goals. They know that keeping Latinos from voting and shutting down immigration, both legal and illegal, is necessary to their political survival as a movement and a party.
Update (June 20):  Parton suggests it's all about the wall.
He is holding all those kids at the border for ransom.
And if modern conservative politics is mostly about making liberals cry, then torturing children certainly does the trick.

And just like that, problem solved!
Lock up immigrant parents and their children together, indefinitely.
Oops.
But there’s no evidence that [Dear Leader] has the legal authority to make his wish reality. His plan, issued in an executive order on Wednesday, conflicts with a 2015 court ruling that required the government to release child migrants from detention after 20 days. [Fuckface] can’t dismiss federal judges’ rulings by decree. So his executive order will trigger a massive showdown between his administration and human rights activists in court.
The Young Turks views the executive order as pretty much a cave by von Clownstick, but also argue that the ultimate goal is to greatly curtail even legal immigration by enacting multiple restrictions. More non-white voters is bad news for Republicans.

Update (June 21):  Kenn Orphan dismisses justifications of the treatment of refugees based on the "rule of law".
Such a rationale only exists in the minds of those whose humanity has long been gutted. It’s one that has been used generously by scoundrels throughout time to ignore their complicity in creating the turmoil in the first place, and then defending the cruelest of policies against the human beings affected by that misery.
Heather Digby Parton points out that illegal border crossings are at a 46 year low. She quotes Chris Hayes:
Before [the zero-tolerance] policy roughly 90% of prosecutions in McAllen federal court were of detained immigrants with criminal records. Since the new policy it’s flipped!
90% of those being prosecuted have no record and are facing misdemeanor charges for first time entry.
Parton explains that these refugees "are far more afraid of what they've left behind them than what lies ahead" which is why this intent on deterrence gets so dangerous. Hayes again:
What that ends up being is you get into a kind of bidding war with the cartels about who can be more monstrous. . . . You end up having to do monstrous things so that the judgment tips in your favor.
Update (June 22):  It's a good thing we have a successful businessman in charge.
[Von Clownstick] has created a crisis involving three separate federal departments while clashing with the two other branches of government. The administration hasn't even been able to keep its communications staffers and agency heads on the same page, so there's likely to be even more misinterpretations up and down the chain of command than those we're seeing play out in the press.
In short, it's not clear there is any concerted effort to clean up the disaster that has already occurred, and there's no consensus within the government about how to keep the disaster from getting worse.
Parton isn't surprised.
He is just as incompetent today as he was the day after his inauguration, when he sent out Sean Spicer in an ill-fitting suit to defend his preposterous claim that his inauguration crowd was bigger than Obama's. In fact, he has actually gotten worse at the job instead of better.
Update (June 24):  "Misstatements" in this administration can't ever be corrected (Germany's crime rate is up due to immigrants) because that would undermine the justification for their policies. Andrew O'Hehir argues it doesn't matter whether von Clownstick believes everything he says or knowingly lies.
[Dear Leader] airs out his outrageous statements and “believes” them for a while — insofar as he believes anything — as long as the adulation keeps on pouring in from his fans, who also “believe” them. Then he discards them without a moment’s thought when they stop working.
The dangerous part is the foundational lie O'Hehir says has been consistent and coherent throughout Fuckface's career.
America is under assault from black and brown savages who want to destroy our culture and ravage our women; only one man, if given unlimited power, can stop them.
Update (June 27):  A U.S. District Court judge has ordered that the children separated from their parents due to the "zero-tolerance" policy be reunited with their families within 30 days.

Update (June 30):  Hundreds of demonstrations against Fuckface immigration policy.

Update (July 6):  Dawn Stover suggests the increase in asylum applications from Central America are due in part to drought and crop losses. These are tied to more frequent El Nino events which are tied to climate change. It's not hard to imagine increasing numbers of climate refugees which will exacerbate conflicts over immigration.

Update (July 15):  Jane Regan wants to restore context to reportage about immigration.
In today’s world, with its borders and customs agents and walls and razor wire, freedom of movement has become detached from the rest of the liberal philosophy that underpinned our revolutionary generation. Why not give those in the Americas who were born—as Jefferson put it—into a country which “chance, not choice, has placed them” the opportunity to go “in quest of new habitations”? Perhaps resurrecting freedom of movement as a “natural right” would at least partly make up for the centuries of pillage and invasion.
Update (July 22):  Molly Redden reminds us that many refugees are fleeing violence prompted by U.S. foreign policy.
For many decades, but particularly in the 1980s, the United States funneled billions of dollars in military aid to authoritarian Central American governments with the stated goal of combating communism. The funding, equipment and training transformed civil wars in Guatemala and El Salvador into conflicts of exceptional brutality.
Update (August 10):  Heather Digby Parton explains how the Right, lead by Laura Ingraham, really really hate all immigrants. Unless they're the First Lady's parents.

Update (October 23):  Republicans are trying stir up fear over a "caravan" of refugees heading up toward the U.S. from Central America. But this is how one independent voter on FOX responded to the "crisis":
This is the mightiest country on the planet, I think we can handle a caravan of people, unarmed, coming to this country.
I'm saying to process them properly.
Update (November 26):  Refugees seeking asylum found a closed port of entry this weekend. So who's really breaking the law here?
[Dear Leader] authorized shooting tear gas late Sunday afternoon from the U.S. border into Mexico against hundreds of migrants, including pregnant women, and children in diapers.
Update (December 4):  Todd Miller explains that most refugees from Central America are fleeing drought. Of course, the most anti-immigrant people in the U.S. are also likely to be climate change deniers as well.

Update (December 10):  I guess this is what "fair and balanced" looks like:
Prime-time Fox News programs used the words "invasion" or "invaders" to describe migrants and asylum-seekers more times in the 30 days leading up to the Nov. 6 election than they did during all of 2015, 2016 and 2017 combined.
Update (December 14):  Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen responds to the death of a seven-year-old Guatemalan girl from dehydration while in U.S. custody.
You know, this is just a very sad example of the dangers of this journey. This family chose to cross illegally.
Update (December 25):  An eight-year-old Guatemalan boy has died while in U.S. custody.

Update (December 26):  Kirstjen Nielsen doubles down.
Our system has been pushed to a breaking point by those who seek open borders. Smugglers, traffickers, and their own parents put these minors at risk by embarking on the dangerous and arduous journey north.
Update (January 8, 2019):  Yeah, we all make mistakes. Or lie through our teeth.
The ... administration has claimed that U.S. border officials detained "nearly 4,000 known or suspected terrorists" last year at the Mexican border. But figures from the federal government’s Department of Customs and Border Protection reveal that only six people on a security watchlist were detained over a six-month period, NBC reports.
A real national emergency.

Update (February 5, 2019):  There might have been thousands more family separations at the border in 2017 and the administration says it would take too much effort to reunite them.

Update (February 6, 2019):  Oops--this quote shows that Fuckface my have forgotten his base doesn't like any kind of immigrant.
Legal immigrants enrich our nation and strengthen our society in countless ways. I want people to come into our country in the largest numbers ever, but they have to come in legally.
Update (February 11, 2019):  Fuckface spews more immigration lies.
Gallup Poll: "Open Borders will potentially attract 42 million Latin Americans." This would be a disaster for the U.S. We need the Wall now!
Heather Digby Parton breaks it down:  No one calls for open borders. It's a disaster only if you believe all of Latin American is a "shithole". The number comes from a blog post by the Gallup chairman--of 450 million Latin Americans, 27 percent would like to move to another country and 35 percent would like to go to the U.S. But many in the United States would like to immigrate themselves yet few actually do.
People say they'd like to move to another country all the time. It doesn't mean they're likely to do it. In the case of the migrant "caravans," we have a humanitarian crisis in Central America that's driving people to seek asylum in the U.S. The vast majority of them are just seeking safety and some kind of security. They certainly aren't coming here for the warm welcome and generous hospitality.
Update (May 22, 2019):  You'd think this alone would be enough grounds for impeachment.
A 16-year-old migrant boy was found dead Monday after being taken into Border Patrol custody, making him the fifth minor since December to die shortly after being detained in a government processing facility. Given the arduous journey many children take to get to the U.S. and the unsanitary conditions in Border Patrol centers, medical experts and immigrant rights advocates warn these deaths are likely to continue.
Update (June 5, 2019):  Border apprehensions are up--does this mean there is a crisis?
May was the third month in a row that border detentions topped 100,000, led by record-breaking levels of illegal crossings by Guatemalan and Honduran parents bringing children.
But does Fuckface know how to handle it?
[T]ariffs are supposed to force Mexico to interdict more people before the cross the border into America, but that’s only the latest desperate move from the White House. So far, all attempts to deter people from making the effort have had no effect.
Update (June 10, 2019):  Amanda Marcotte explains just how stupid Dear Leader is.
[His] assumption that illegal immigration from Mexico is a significant issue, which like most of his ideas was forged in the 1980s, is flatly false. In fact, there's been a dramatic decline both in undocumented immigrants and Mexicans illegally crossing the border. Instead, the pressing immigration issue right now is that large numbers of Central Americans are seeking political asylum in the U.S., as is their right under international law.
Predictably unwilling to admit he was wrong, [Fuckface] has been desperately trying to find a way to blame Mexico anyway. So he landed on this idea of holding Mexico responsible for Central American immigrants, employing the super-racist logic that Mexico, a Spanish-speaking country, has more responsibility to deal with Central Americans than the U.S. does. So, in one of his racist bro-downs with [Stephen] Miller, he came up with this idea of "punishing" Mexico for immigrants who aren't actually from Mexico.
Update (June 23, 2019):  While Chuck Todd professes shock at the use of the words "concentration camps" by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, there seems to be no equivalent outrage over Dear Leader's (now delayed) plan to deport "millions" of immigrants. Cody Fenwick notes:
It’s not close to feasible that [Fuckface] will be able to achieve that scale of arrests, of course, but part of the purpose seems to be to terrify the immigrant population, so exaggeration is a feature, not a bug.
Update (July 1, 2019):  His publisher says Michael de Adder was not fired for this cartoon.


He should be ashamed of himself for being so rude!
Members of a secret Facebook group for current and former Border Patrol agents joked about the deaths of migrants, discussed throwing burritos at Latino members of Congress visiting a detention facility in Texas on Monday and posted a vulgar illustration depicting Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez engaged in oral sex with a detained migrant.
Representative Judy Chu:
What we saw was appalling and disgusting.
Update (July 3, 2019):  A crisis of our own making.
The Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General found "dangerous overcrowding," prolonged detention and health risks to migrants at multiple Border Patrol facilities in South Texas, according to a report the agency watchdog released Tuesday.
One official at a Border Patrol facility told investigators that the migrant crisis is a "ticking time bomb."

Monday, April 2, 2018

State Media

Deadspin created this video:

Sinclair Broadcasting Group, which owns more than 170 U.S. TV stations, has ordered local news anchors across the country to read a script decrying “some media outlets” for “false news” and “fake stories.”
“This is extremely dangerous to a democracy,” the script reads.
The editing is clever. Maybe it's just me, but one women seems to gesture in a way that says, "This right here, what we're doing now, is extremely dangerous to our democracy".

Dear Leader has no problem with it, but Dan Rather differs.
News anchors looking into camera and reading a script handed down by a corporate overlord, words meant to obscure the truth not elucidate it, isn't journalism. It's propaganda. It's Orwellian. A slippery slope to how despots wrest power, silence dissent, and oppress the masses.
A former Sinclair news director says employees signed multi-year contracts and were penalized for leaving their contract early.
Sinclair knows its strongest asset is the credibility of its local anchors. They’re trusted voices in their communities, and they have often been on the air for decades before Sinclair purchased their stations.
Sinclair forces those trusted local journalists to lend their credibility to shoddy reporting and commentary that, if it ran in other countries, we would rightly dismiss as state propaganda.
During my time with Sinclair, while on a conference call with other news directors, someone asked if we could ever run local commentary during newscasts. The answer was a firm “no.” The only opinions Sinclair allows on air are the opinions that come out of headquarters, because the company will not risk giving local audiences a dissenting view.
That “no” was telling. Being afraid of a variety of viewpoints is, in the words of Sinclair’s now-infamous “must-run,” extremely dangerous to a democracy.
Update (April 3):  Bloomberg has documentation on those Sinclair employee contracts.
According to copies of two employment contracts reviewed by Bloomberg, some Sinclair employees were subject to a liquidated damages clause for leaving before the term of their agreement was up: one that requires they pay as much as 40 percent of their annual compensation to the company.
Young Turks claims damages were paid whether an employee quit or was fired.

Update (April 4):  Another Sinclair employee speaks out.
That thing ran twice a day every day last week, and we got not one complaint about it. It wasn’t until Deadspin put this video together that everyone freaked out about it. It’s been brutal. We got about 60 emails ― hateful emails ― yesterday, dozens of phone calls, people yelling profanity at us. I have people yelling at me, saying I’m a zombie, that I’m soulless, that I’ve sold my integrity, which is not nice to hear. So yeah, it sucks.
If you want to make a difference, lobby your lawmakers to have them stop the Tribune deal from going through, because that is what is dangerous about this. It’s dangerous for any company to own as many stations as Sinclair does.
Update (April 14):  Sophia McClennen explains how Sinclair takes advantage of the fact more people trust their local news.
[T]he big story here is the way that Sinclair is setting itself up to control the political narrative in local TV markets.
A new study by Gregory J. Martin and Josh McCrain shows that stations bought by Sinclair reduce coverage of local politics, increase national coverage and move the ideological tone of coverage in a conservative direction relative to other stations operating in the same market.
Update (June 24):  Pam Vogel quotes Boris Epshteyn in another Sinclair "must run" commentary.
Many members of the media and opponents of the president have seized on [the zero tolerance] issue to make it seem as if those who are tough on immigration are somehow monsters. Let’s be honest: While some of the concern is real, a lot of it is politically driven by the liberals in politics and the media.